ANDROID

Intel’s P-core-only CPUs are up to 26% slower in leaked benchmarks

×

Intel’s P-core-only CPUs are up to 26% slower in leaked benchmarks

Share this article
Intel’s P-core-only CPUs are up to 26% slower in leaked benchmarks


Thanks to a leaked benchmark, we have our first peek at the performance of Intel’s new E-Series line-up. As you might expect for a range dedicated to embedded systems, Intel Core i9-14901KE doesn’t quite match other flagship processors due to the absence of E cores.

According to a Geekbench 6 database entry, Core i9-14901KE delivers 3,018 single-core points and 16,308 multi-core points when running at around 5.4GHz. This puts it 26% lower than the fully-fledged i9-14900K in multi-core, or slightly slower than the i9-12900K. Since nothing changes on the P cores, single-core performance remains identical to the regular 14900K.

Core i9-14901KE is part of a large new series of CPUs, which also includes i7-14701E, i5-14501E, i5-14401E, and i5-14401EF. All of these lack the brand’s Gracemont E cores, as noted by their E suffix that stands for Embedded. Now, without E cores to further separate the stack, we get only two major designs: eight P cores on the i7 plus i9 models, and six P cores on the i5. That said, the frequency and power budget still play a role here, as the top i5 and i9 variants come with a higher base clock.

To put it simply, Core i9-14901KE is an i9-14900K but with disabled E cores. We lose 16 threads due to the missing E cores, which means that Windows background tasks will be funnelled to the P cores, like the old days. Whether this will impact its gaming capabilities or not is hard to say, but I bet it wouldn’t make much difference as eight cores are already enough for most titles.

What is sure is that professional apps, especially those that can leverage the E cores, will see a noticeable reduction in performance. And to a lesser extent, users who leave a lot of background tasks open while gaming will experience the same.

See also  Foil stick fire? Discover simple solutions to common issues

The main positive that comes out of these chips should be a lower price tag. After all, if you get less in the package, then you shouldn’t pay as much as the full-fat model. But as these are likely to be OEM exclusives, we’ll need to wait and see what systems housing E-Series sell for.



Source Link Website

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *