If you are considering connecting an external eGPU to your laptop or or wondering which connection you should use. This Thunderbolt vs Oculink everything you need to know guide will provide more insight into the two fastest options. Thunderbolt and Oculink are two powerful contenders designed to provide solutions for different purposes.
Choosing the right external GPU (eGPU) is a crucial decision for anyone looking to boost their device’s graphics performance. With options like Thunderbolt and Oculink available, it can be challenging to determine which one best suits your needs. In this guide, we’ll dive deep into the world of eGPUs, exploring the performance, connectivity, and practical considerations of Thunderbolt and Oculink to help you make an informed decision.
Quick Links
Thunderbolt vs Oculink
Key Takeaways :
- Thunderbolt is a highly versatile external connection technology known for high data speeds, video support, and power delivery.
- Oculink is primarily focused on internal server and storage applications with optimized PCIe-based performance for smaller devices.
- Thunderbolt offers higher bandwidth, with up to 40 Gbps speeds, while Oculink is optimized for internal connectivity, providing PCIe Gen 3 and Gen 4 performance.
- Oculink offers a more compact design but is less common in consumer devices compared to Thunderbolt’s widespread usage.
- Thunderbolt provides more flexibility, supporting data, video, and power, whereas Oculink is limited to data transfer and storage applications.
- Thunderbolt devices tend to be more expensive, reflecting its broader use and higher bandwidth potential.
- Thunderbolt eGPUs offer high-speed connectivity, additional ports, and convenience but are limited by PCIe 3.0 lanes (32Gbps).
- Oculink eGPUs use PCIe 4.0 for higher bandwidth, are not hot-swappable, and require an m.2 adapter for compatibility.
- m.2 eGPUs are budget-friendly but require device disassembly and offer limited PCIe lanes.
- PCIe 4.0 provides double the bandwidth of PCIe 3.0; USB4 is the latest high-speed standard compatible with Thunderbolt.
- High-end GPUs like RTX 4090 may be overkill for Thunderbolt eGPUs due to bandwidth limitations; Intel GPUs have driver issues.
- A robust power supply is essential for stable performance and additional power needs.
- Oculink eGPUs generally outperform Thunderbolt eGPUs in 4k benchmarks due to higher bandwidth.
- Thunderbolt eGPUs offer ease of use with a single cable and additional ports, while Oculink eGPUs provide better performance but require more steps.
- Choose based on your specific needs, budget, and device compatibility for the best eGPU setup.
What is Thunderbolt?
Thunderbolt is a technology developed by Intel, known for combining multiple features into one cable. It allows the transmission of data, video, and power through a single connection. Thunderbolt cables and ports are most commonly found in external devices, including storage solutions, displays, and docking stations, making it a go-to solution for professionals who need high-speed data transfer and video output from one interface.
Since its initial launch in 2011, Thunderbolt has evolved significantly. Thunderbolt 3 and 4 are the latest versions, boasting speeds of up to 40 Gbps. With Thunderbolt, you can connect up to two 4K monitors or a single 8K monitor, which makes it an excellent choice for creative professionals working with high-resolution media. Additionally, Thunderbolt is backward compatible with USB-C, giving it extensive utility in modern devices.
What is Oculink?
Oculink, developed by the PCI-SIG group, is a lesser-known technology designed to offer compact and efficient data transfer using PCIe interfaces. It was initially designed as a replacement for internal SAS and SATA cables in servers and storage systems, offering PCIe Gen 3 and Gen 4 performance in a smaller form factor.
Unlike Thunderbolt, Oculink is intended primarily for internal connections, such as between a server’s motherboard and storage devices. Although it doesn’t support video or power delivery like Thunderbolt, Oculink’s compact size and efficient bandwidth utilization make it suitable for dense computing environments, where space and speed are crucial.
Here are a selection of other articles from our extensive library of content you may find of interest on the subject of using external graphics cards :
Performance Comparison
Thunderbolt 3 and 4 offer impressive speeds of up to 40 Gbps, supporting multiple types of data streams, including data transfer, video output, and even charging devices. This broad functionality makes Thunderbolt incredibly versatile, especially for consumer electronics like laptops, monitors, and external storage.
Oculink, on the other hand, operates over PCIe lanes, allowing it to achieve speeds comparable to PCIe Gen 3 or Gen 4 interfaces. For example, PCIe Gen 3 Oculink can provide up to 32 Gbps over four lanes, and Gen 4 can exceed 64 Gbps. However, Oculink is limited to data transfers and does not handle video or power delivery.
- Thunderbolt eGPUs: Known for their high-speed connectivity and convenience, Thunderbolt eGPUs come with additional ports, such as USB and Type-C, and support features like charging and hot-swapping. However, they are limited by PCIe 3.0 lanes, which offer a maximum bandwidth of 32Gbps. To use a Thunderbolt eGPU, your device must have a Thunderbolt 3/4 or USB4 port.
- Oculink eGPUs: Oculink eGPUs provide a more affordable alternative to Thunderbolt eGPUs. They use PCIe 4.0, which offers higher bandwidth compared to Thunderbolt. However, Oculink eGPUs lack hot-swapping capabilities and require an m.2 adapter for compatibility. They are generally more expensive than m.2 eGPUs but offer superior performance.
- m.2 eGPUs: For those on a tight budget, m.2 eGPUs are the most affordable option. However, they come with significant limitations. They require device disassembly and typically offer only four PCIe lanes. Compatibility with PCIe 3.0 and 4.0 is a consideration, and they are less convenient compared to Thunderbolt or Oculink options.
In terms of performance, Thunderbolt offers a broader range of functionalities, while Oculink excels in data transfer within servers or high-density computing environments.
Use Cases
Thunderbolt is ideal for users who need external connectivity for multiple types of devices. Creative professionals, gamers, and IT administrators all benefit from Thunderbolt’s ability to handle high data transfer rates, video output, and power delivery simultaneously. It’s often used in docking stations that provide all-in-one connectivity for laptops, especially in workstations that require multiple displays or high-performance peripherals.
Oculink, by contrast, is more specialized. It’s commonly found in internal server environments where space is limited, but high-performance connectivity is essential. Storage systems and servers benefit from Oculink’s efficiency and smaller cables, making it a popular choice for enterprise-level IT infrastructure.
Compatibility and Expansion
Thunderbolt stands out for its backward compatibility with USB-C. This means you can plug a Thunderbolt cable into a USB-C port, though you may not get Thunderbolt-level performance. Many laptops, monitors, and external storage devices now support Thunderbolt, making it a widely adopted standard for both consumer and professional use.
Oculink, being more niche, is primarily found in specialized environments like servers. It does not offer the same level of flexibility as Thunderbolt but is efficient for connecting PCIe devices in smaller spaces.
Cost
Thunderbolt devices and accessories tend to be more expensive due to their high-speed capabilities and multi-functionality. This includes docking stations, external storage units, and even Thunderbolt-compatible monitors. The higher cost reflects the broad use cases and flexibility of the technology.
Oculink solutions are generally more cost-effective, particularly in enterprise setups where the focus is on high-performance, internal connections rather than external versatility. The compact design and specialized use of Oculink make it less prevalent in the consumer market, but its efficiency in data transfer for servers keeps costs reasonable in that space.
In conclusion, Thunderbolt and Oculink serve different purposes, with Thunderbolt offering a broader range of capabilities and Oculink excelling in compact, high-performance data transfers in internal systems. Understanding your specific needs—whether external versatility or internal efficiency—is key to choosing the right solution.
Media Credit: TST
Filed Under: Guides
Latest TechMehow Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, TechMehow may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.